<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rank: 10 Most Important Cars From the 1990&#8242;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karfarm.com/mag/2009/05/rank-10-most-important-cars-from-the-1990s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karfarm.com/mag/2009/05/rank-10-most-important-cars-from-the-1990s/</link>
	<description>KarFarm Mag is an online resource to read up on the current automotive industry news, events, trends, and opinions. KarFarm Mag also reviews cars, trucks, suv, cuv, and supercars, in text and video review format which is easy to read.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: William Stokes</title>
		<link>http://karfarm.com/mag/2009/05/rank-10-most-important-cars-from-the-1990s/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>William Stokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karfarm.com/mag/?p=3366#comment-905</guid>
		<description>It always amazes me when a journalist says something like &quot;Before the 1990 300ZX Turbo, Japanese sports cars were considered second class citizens.&quot;   That statement is kind of like criticizing factory defects in a car entered in  the stock class in a professionally judged car show, It shows just how little they really know...and are willing to research and verify...before opening their mouth or submitting an article-too bad the editor of this site didn&#039;t know any better either....

There is a  wealth of information in Road and Track(Road And Track said the 240Z had &quot;styling, performance, and handling far ahead of anthing else&quot; in its price range.&quot;), Car and Driver( C&amp;D named the Datsun/Nissan 240z the car of the year for 1971) , and most of the car magazines from the early 70s-not to mention Racing results(SCCA C production was dominated by the Z car 1970-78(Campionship winner every single year)-and later, winning the East African Safari 1971, 72 and &#039;73, et. all...that show the Datsun 240Z(Nissan 240Z) was the sports car that ate Porsche, Alfa, BMW, and a few more for breakfast, taught American sports cars how to handle(Motor Trend: &quot;the 240z is a Group 5 racer by comparison to the Z/28&quot;), and dealt the death blow to the English sports car market in America.  
Kind of tough consider Japanese cars &quot;second class citizens&quot; when they were the named as royalty by all of the American car magazines in terms of sales(then and now the best selling sports car of all time), performance, and value.  Lets not forget the induction of Yutaka Katayama into the Automotive Hall of Fame at the time of the 300ZX-but primarily for his efforts in building Nissan America with the 240Z and the small pickup trucks, and his continued efforts with the Z car.

The 300ZX is one of the 10 best cars of the 90s, but Japanese cars were seen as second class sitizens up until the 240Z-the car that started the Tuner craze-before it no other import had the following to develop an aftermaket following.
William Stokes-for the record, I own a 1972 240Z and a 1993 300ZX convertible-and love them both for different reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazes me when a journalist says something like &#8220;Before the 1990 300ZX Turbo, Japanese sports cars were considered second class citizens.&#8221;   That statement is kind of like criticizing factory defects in a car entered in  the stock class in a professionally judged car show, It shows just how little they really know&#8230;and are willing to research and verify&#8230;before opening their mouth or submitting an article-too bad the editor of this site didn&#8217;t know any better either&#8230;.</p>
<p>There is a  wealth of information in Road and Track(Road And Track said the 240Z had &#8220;styling, performance, and handling far ahead of anthing else&#8221; in its price range.&#8221;), Car and Driver( C&amp;D named the Datsun/Nissan 240z the car of the year for 1971) , and most of the car magazines from the early 70s-not to mention Racing results(SCCA C production was dominated by the Z car 1970-78(Campionship winner every single year)-and later, winning the East African Safari 1971, 72 and &#8217;73, et. all&#8230;that show the Datsun 240Z(Nissan 240Z) was the sports car that ate Porsche, Alfa, BMW, and a few more for breakfast, taught American sports cars how to handle(Motor Trend: &#8220;the 240z is a Group 5 racer by comparison to the Z/28&#8243;), and dealt the death blow to the English sports car market in America.<br />
Kind of tough consider Japanese cars &#8220;second class citizens&#8221; when they were the named as royalty by all of the American car magazines in terms of sales(then and now the best selling sports car of all time), performance, and value.  Lets not forget the induction of Yutaka Katayama into the Automotive Hall of Fame at the time of the 300ZX-but primarily for his efforts in building Nissan America with the 240Z and the small pickup trucks, and his continued efforts with the Z car.</p>
<p>The 300ZX is one of the 10 best cars of the 90s, but Japanese cars were seen as second class sitizens up until the 240Z-the car that started the Tuner craze-before it no other import had the following to develop an aftermaket following.<br />
William Stokes-for the record, I own a 1972 240Z and a 1993 300ZX convertible-and love them both for different reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://karfarm.com/mag/2009/05/rank-10-most-important-cars-from-the-1990s/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karfarm.com/mag/?p=3366#comment-125</guid>
		<description>I think the NSX should have been on the list. 
It was the 1st  &#039;Japanese supercar&#039; and more than that proved you could have Ferrari looks/performance and Honda reliability.

It also caused Ferrari to seriously up their game. Many of the improvements on the 355 were a direct result of the new competition from Japan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the NSX should have been on the list.<br />
It was the 1st  &#8216;Japanese supercar&#8217; and more than that proved you could have Ferrari looks/performance and Honda reliability.</p>
<p>It also caused Ferrari to seriously up their game. Many of the improvements on the 355 were a direct result of the new competition from Japan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://karfarm.com/mag/2009/05/rank-10-most-important-cars-from-the-1990s/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karfarm.com/mag/?p=3366#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I stopped reading your article after the first sentence.  It&#039;s so full of wrong it&#039;s not even funny.

I mean to say that your researching skills are below subpar.  Saturn was formed in the mid 80&#039;s by GM.  Period.  They didn&#039;t form out of thin air and GM later scooped them up.  I mean, honestly, if you spent just 10 minutes of simple research or even just looking at the body lines of a 1st generation Saturn you could figure it out.

Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped reading your article after the first sentence.  It&#8217;s so full of wrong it&#8217;s not even funny.</p>
<p>I mean to say that your researching skills are below subpar.  Saturn was formed in the mid 80&#8242;s by GM.  Period.  They didn&#8217;t form out of thin air and GM later scooped them up.  I mean, honestly, if you spent just 10 minutes of simple research or even just looking at the body lines of a 1st generation Saturn you could figure it out.</p>
<p>Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://karfarm.com/mag/2009/05/rank-10-most-important-cars-from-the-1990s/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karfarm.com/mag/?p=3366#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Saturn was Roger Smith&#039;s baby when he was Chairman of GM.  It was treated like a separate company for several years, but the entire concept, marketing and staffing all came from GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturn was Roger Smith&#8217;s baby when he was Chairman of GM.  It was treated like a separate company for several years, but the entire concept, marketing and staffing all came from GM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Herrup</title>
		<link>http://karfarm.com/mag/2009/05/rank-10-most-important-cars-from-the-1990s/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Herrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karfarm.com/mag/?p=3366#comment-118</guid>
		<description>all that crap except beavis &amp; butthead is from the 80&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all that crap except beavis &amp; butthead is from the 80&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

